- institutions
- appropriate infrastructure
- a stable macroeconomic framework
- good health and primary education
- higher education and training
- efficient goods markets
- efficient labor markets
- developed financial markets
- the ability to harness the benefits of existing technologies
- and its market size, both domestic and international
- by producing new and different goods using the most sophisticated production processes
- innovation
This year, Japan has dropped its ranking from number 8 to number 9, being replaced by the United Kingdom. Though Japan has slipped in the GCI, they have moved up a couple spots in the other pillars such as: infrastructure, technological readiness, and macroeconomic environment.
"Japan slips to No. 9 in World Economic Forum’s competitiveness index". (2017, November 3). Japan Times. Retrieved from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/09/27/business/japan-slips-notch-ninth-wefs-competitiveness-rankings-137-economies/#.WfyMpWhSyM8
Is that because Japan is doing less good than before focusing on all these factors or is the UK just doing better?
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting that Switzerland topped the list overall for the 9th straight year - they must be doing something right! I wouldn't have guessed that Switzerland would be at the top of that list, let alone for that long of a time period.
ReplyDelete